Re: Sequential scan where Index scan expected (update) - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From Gregory S. Williamson
Subject Re: Sequential scan where Index scan expected (update)
Date
Msg-id 71E37EF6B7DCC1499CEA0316A2568328024BC055@loki.wc.globexplorer.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Sequential scan where Index scan expected (update)  (Bryce Nesbitt <bryce1@obviously.com>)
Responses Re: Sequential scan where Index scan expected (update)
List pgsql-sql
Perhaps it is clogged with dead tuples -- has it been vacuumed recently with enough FSM space ?

It seems unlikely but maybe try an explict cast for the thing_id call, e.g.
explain update xx_thing_event set thing_color='foo' where
thing_event_id=10000::bigint;

It may also be that 5842 rows is enough that the planner decides it is faster to do a sequential scan that the busier
indexscan (read index, get data row, versus just reading all the necessary pages in one faster sequential scan). 

If you set the sequential scan parameter in the config file and reload postgres does the same query get faster ? (not
suggestingthis for real runtime use but it can be useful to diagnose issues). 

Greg Williamson
DBA
GlobeXplorer LLC


-----Original Message-----
From:    pgsql-sql-owner@postgresql.org on behalf of Bryce Nesbitt
Sent:    Thu 3/2/2006 11:28 PM
To:    pgsql-sql@postgresql.org
Cc:
Subject:    [SQL] Sequential scan where Index scan expected (update)
I'm getting sequential scans (and poor performance), on scans using my
primary keys.  This is an older postgres.
Can anyone help figure out why?


demo=# \d xx_thing                    Table "public.xx_thing"        Column          |            Type             |
Modifiers
-------------------------+-----------------------------+-----------thing_id              | bigint
|not null 
thing_model           | character varying(128)      |thing_color           | character varying(128)      |thing_year
       | integer                     | 
Indexes:   "xx_thing_pkey" primary key, btree (thing_id)


demo=# analyze verbose xx_thing_event;
INFO:  analyzing "public.xx_thing_event"
INFO:  "xx_thing_event": 3374 pages, 3000 rows sampled, 197478 estimated
total rows


demo=# explain update xx_thing_event set thing_color='foo' where
thing_event_id=10000;                            QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------Seq Scan on xx_thing_event  (cost=0.00..5842.48
rows=1width=110)  Filter: (thing_event_id = 10000) 
(2 rows)



demo=# select * from version();                                                version
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------PostgreSQL
7.4.1on i686-pc-linux-gnu, compiled by GCC gcc (GCC) 3.2.3 
20030502 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.3-20)
(1 row)


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate      subscribe-nomail command to
majordomo@postgresql.orgso that your      message can get through to the mailing list cleanly 

!DSPAM:4407f048253644359117518!






pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Bryce Nesbitt
Date:
Subject: Sequential scan where Index scan expected (update)
Next
From: Joost Kraaijeveld
Date:
Subject: Why do I get these results?????