On Jul 16, 2010, at 2:27 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
> If we continue with the approach I took, we should implement the suggestion to create a new data type for this in
9.1.That would be more waterproof than the changes I made, if we introduce new ways to call functions in the future.
The downside is that it might cause the approach used in the older releases to get less testing.
...Robert
