Re: Something else about Redo Logs disappearing - Mailing list pgsql-general
From | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Subject | Re: Something else about Redo Logs disappearing |
Date | |
Msg-id | 70c94711-07e4-796c-f4a1-a17e7f5ae1e1@aklaver.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | Re: Something else about Redo Logs disappearing (Peter <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>) |
Responses |
Re: Something else about Redo Logs disappearing
(Peter <pmc@citylink.dinoex.sub.org>)
|
List | pgsql-general |
On 6/9/20 10:55 AM, Peter wrote: > On Mon, Jun 08, 2020 at 09:21:47PM -0700, Adrian Klaver wrote: > ! > ! On 6/8/20 7:33 PM, Peter wrote: > ! > > ! > Actually, the affair had some good side: as usual I was checking > ! > my own designs first and looking for flaws, and indeed I found one: > ! > If you do copy out the archive logs not directly to tape, but to > ! > some disk area for further processing, then there is an issue with > ! > possible loss. If you do it like the docs say, with a command like > ! > this: > ! > archive_command = 'test ! -f /mnt/server/archivedir/%f && cp %p > ! > +/mnt/server/archivedir/%f' # Unix > ! > That "cp" is usually not synchronous. So there is the possibility > ! > that this command terminates successfully, and reports exitcode zero > ! > back to the Postgres, and then the Postgres will consider that log > ! > being safely away. > ! > ! Which is why just following the above command in the docs is: > ! > ! "(This is an example, not a recommendation, and might not work on all > ! platforms.) " > > So, what You are basically saying is: my worries are justified and > correctly founded, and this is indeed a matter that needs to be taken > care of. > Thank You. > > ! Generally for peace of mind folks use third party tools like: > ! > ! pg_backrest(https://pgbackrest.org/), > ! pg_probackup(https://postgrespro.com/products/extensions/pg_probackup) or > ! Barman(https://www.pgbarman.org/). > > Hmja. We may on occasion have a look into these... > > ! I use pg_backrest, but it does not look promising for running on BSD: > ! https://fluca1978.github.io/2019/03/04/pgbackrest_FreeBSD.html > > That looks mostly like the usual things which can be fixed. > > Now, for the facts: I am already using a professional backup > solution. (It is actually a "dual-use/commercial" solution, of the > kind which you can either fetch from github and use without support, > or buy with a contract or whatever and get support.) > > With this professional backup solution I have already identified 28 > (spell: twenty-eight) bugs, and fixed/workarounded these, until I got it > properly working. > > This professional backup solution also offers support for postgres. > Sadly, it only covers postgres up to Rel.9, and that piece of software > wasn't touched in the last 6 or 7 years. > But the bigger issue there is, that backup solution needs it's > own postgres database as it's backend - and it cannot backup the > database it is using. Looks quite pointless to me, then. > So I just did it all with shell (and it wasn't many lines). The backup solution is? > > So now, as I've been thru identifying and handling all the issues in > that one backup solution, and since it is supposed to handle *all* > backup demands (and not only postgres), I will certainly not start > and go thru the same process again with one of these supposed > solutions, where 90% of the code tries to solve the same things > redundantly again, but then only for PG. They are not supposed. They are in use by many people/organizations across a wide variety of installations. > > > Actually, I am getting very tired of reading that something which can > easily be done within 20 lines of shell scripting, would need special > "solutions", solutions that need to be compiled, solutions that would > bring along their own fashion of interpreter, solutions that have a > lot of their own dependencies and introduce mainly one thing: new bugs. They where developed as they could not be done in 20 lines of shell scripting and work at a reliable level. Fine rant below. Go forth and work your wonders. > > Does nobody know anymore how to do proper systems management > scripting? Using just the basic system tools which have proven to > work for more than 50 years now!? > > ! Not sure about pg_probackup. > > Okay, I had a -very short- look into these. Just scanning the > introductory pages. > > The only really interesting thing there is the pg_probackup. These > folks seem to have found a way to do row-level incremental backups. > > And pgbarman seems to have an impressive understanding of ITIL (in > case anybody bothers about that). > > All these tools do only cover PG, but do that in any possible regards. > > This is fine as long as you do not run any computers, and the only > application you are using is Postgres. > But, if you have other applications as well, or have computers, then > you will need a different backup solution, something that will cover > your site-wide backup demands, in a consistent fashion (think > something in the style of ADSM, or nowadays called Spectrum Protect). > > And then 90% of the things offered here become superfluous, because > they are already handled site-wide. And then you will have to > consider integration of both pieces - and that will most likely be > more work and more error-prone than just writing a few adapters in > shell. > > > > cheerio, > PMc > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@aklaver.com
pgsql-general by date: