Re: A bug in triggers PG 7.1.3 or misunderstand ? - Mailing list pgsql-sql

From domingo@dad-it.com (Domingo Alvarez Duarte)
Subject Re: A bug in triggers PG 7.1.3 or misunderstand ?
Date
Msg-id 70a76315.0109280028.439dff84@posting.google.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A bug in triggers PG 7.1.3 or misunderstand ?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-sql
tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote in message news:<28856.1001608373@sss.pgh.pa.us>...
> I think you need "return old", not "return new", in the body of the
> trigger if you want the delete to take place.  new would be NULL in
> a delete situation ...
> 
>             regards, tom lane
> 
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 5: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
> 
> http://www.postgresql.org/users-lounge/docs/faq.html

Ok I saw that in the documentation so I tryied a variant of it:

if TG_OP = 'DELETE' thenreturn old;
elsereturn new;
end if;

But the TG_OP comes empty and it allawys try return new preventing the
delete to happen.

And that was supposed to work isn't it ?


pgsql-sql by date:

Previous
From: Jeong Jaeick, 정재익
Date:
Subject: Question about indexing!
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: 7.0.3 and 7.1.3 different results?