Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gilles Darold
Subject Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Date
Msg-id 709ee094-829f-25ee-a23c-8e61e290556a@dalibo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function  ("Karl O. Pinc" <kop@meme.com>)
Responses Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
Re: Patch to implement pg_current_logfile() function
List pgsql-hackers
Le 16/11/2016 à 17:38, Karl O. Pinc a écrit :
> On Mon, 7 Nov 2016 23:29:28 +0100
> Gilles Darold <gilles.darold@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
>> Here is the v13 of the patch, ...
> Attached is a doc patch to apply on top of v13.
>
> It adds a lot more detail regards just what is
> in the current_logfiles file and when it's
> in current_logfiles.  I'd like review both for
> language and accuracy, but I'd also like to
> confirm that we really want the documented
> behavior regards what's there at backend startup
> v.s. what's there during normal runtime.  Seems
> ok the way it is to me but...
>
> This patch is also starting to put a lot of information
> inside a graphical table.  I'm fine with this but
> it's a bit of a departure from the other cells of
> the table so maybe somebody else has a better
> suggestion.
>
> Regards,
>
> Karl <kop@meme.com>
> Free Software:  "You don't pay back, you pay forward."
>                  -- Robert A. Heinlein
>

All patches you've submitted on tha v13 patch have been applied and are
present in attached v14 of the patch. I have not included the patches
about GUC changes because I'm not sure that adding a new file
(include/utils/guc_values.h) just for that will be accepted or that it
will not require a more global work to add other GUC values. However
perhaps this patch can be submitted separately if the decision is not
taken here.

Regards,

--
Gilles Darold
Consultant PostgreSQL
http://dalibo.com - http://dalibo.org


Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Mail thread references in commits
Next
From: David Steele
Date:
Subject: Re: Fix checkpoint skip logic on idle systems by tracking LSN progress