Re: BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5 - Mailing list pgsql-bugs
From | Douglas, Ryan |
---|---|
Subject | Re: BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5 |
Date | |
Msg-id | 706C25916A1ADD489F69906EC24FC07E026FDE93@vamail02.TheXchange.com Whole thread Raw |
In response to | BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5 ("Ryan Douglas" <rdouglas@arbinet.com>) |
Responses |
Re: BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5
|
List | pgsql-bugs |
Both actually...=20=20 When just the "return" is commented out the routine goes into a loop and the following shows up in the logs... <rdouglas@tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer <rdouglas@tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer <rdouglas@tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer <rdouglas@tacacs 10.0.20.38(47254) 2009-10-16 01:12:18.935 EDT>LOG: could not receive data from client: Connection reset by peer When just "ereport" is commented out I still get a sigfault...=20 <[unknown]@[unknown] 2009-10-16 01:13:49.211 EDT>LOG: connection received: host=3D10.0.20.38 port=3D32815 <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.258 EDT>LOG: server process (PID 13201) was terminated by signal 11: Segmentation fault <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.258 EDT>LOG: terminating any other active server processes <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.262 EDT>LOG: all server processes terminated; reinitializing <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.381 EDT>LOG: database system was interrupted; last known up at 2009-10-16 01:13:37 EDT <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.382 EDT>LOG: database system was not properly shut down; automatic recovery in progress <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.382 EDT>LOG: record with zero length at 3/B7D75538 <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.383 EDT>LOG: redo is not required <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.409 EDT>LOG: autovacuum launcher started <@ 2009-10-16 01:13:49.410 EDT>LOG: database system is ready to accept connections But when both are commented it seems to work... <[unknown]@[unknown] 2009-10-16 01:15:05.330 EDT>LOG: connection received: host=3D10.0.20.38 port=3D32816 <[unknown]@[unknown] 2009-10-16 01:15:17.436 EDT>LOG: connection received: host=3D10.0.20.38 port=3D32817 <rdouglas@tacacs 10.0.20.38(32817) 2009-10-16 01:15:17.486 EDT>LOG: connection authorized: user=3Drdouglas database=3Dtacacs -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us]=20 Sent: Friday, October 16, 2009 1:01 AM To: Douglas, Ryan Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #5121: Segmentation Fault when using pam w/ krb5 "Douglas, Ryan" <RDouglas@arbinet.com> writes: > Ok... I compiled 8.2.14 and 8.3.8 with the same configure options. They > both segfaut when doing the authentication. Note that when I use -W > option with psql everything works ok. I went back to 8.4.1 enabled the > max debug level then re-tested and got the info below in the log. I went > to line 769 in pqcomm.c and commented the ereport and return EOF lines > and recompiled. Now when I connect it works without a segfault. Hope > this narrows things down. Which is it that makes the difference ... the ereport or the return? regards, tom lane
pgsql-bugs by date: