Re: Refcursor bug - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Altaf Malik
Subject Re: Refcursor bug
Date
Msg-id 704996.38286.qm@web39113.mail.mud.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Refcursor bug  (Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com>)
Responses Re: Refcursor bug  (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Yes it is useless but at least we cannot prevent the user from doing it. Does it mean we should throw exception and not allow user to get even the first resultset? Because exception comes internally when processing the resultset.

--Altaf

Kris Jurka <books@ejurka.com> wrote:


On Fri, 27 Apr 2007, Altaf Malik wrote:

> Hi, I encountered a bug with refcursors with the latest JDBC driver. I
> cannot get two refcursors as OUT parameter if both of them point to the
> same underlying refcursor.
>

Is this an actual problem or just something you came up with to make it
fail? I don't see the use case here because the previous driver version
would return the full ResultSet and then an empty one because everything
had been fetched from it. So that would be pretty useless.

Kris Jurka


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: explain analyze is your friend


Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell?
Check out new cars at Yahoo! Autos.

pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: Refcursor bug
Next
From: Dave Cramer
Date:
Subject: Re: Refcursor bug