> On 26 Feb 2016, at 5:30, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/25/2016 8:26 PM, drum.lucas@gmail.com wrote:
>>
>> I'm doing the pg_restore now in a 1.5TB file:
>>
>> # ls -la
>> postgres postgres 1575324616939 Feb 20 13:55 devdb_0.sql
>>
>> But, the restore has gone over 1.6 TB
>>
>
> the dump file does not contain the indexes, just CREATE INDEX statements
Or page alignment padding, or the effects of fill factors, to name a few more reasons.
Besides, your dump-file is compressed. It's being restored using pg_restore (or can it restore using plain text sql
scriptsthese days?) instead of psql.
Lastly, how does a database in unicode fare for text size (without toasted values) against a plain text dump file in,
say,utf-8 - which isn't even the worst case scenario? That's the simplistic case; in reality some values will get
toastedand the dump file is compressed.
Alban Hertroys
--
If you can't see the forest for the trees,
cut the trees and you'll find there is no forest.
