Hi Carlos, I am working on project right now you might be interested in, namely a extfh interface to postgresql and a
isamwrapper for libpq. I already have an isam bridge working direct to postgresql from AcuCobol without using odbc or
acommercial driver. I just need to convert it to extfh and do a few other things to support microfocus.
Merlin
________________________________________
From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Carlos Henrique Reimer
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 7:24 AM
To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org
Subject: [ODBC] Application bottlenecks
Hello,
We are using Cobol Microfocus and pgsqlODBC to access Postgresql.
Originally these applications only accessed Oracle databases without ODBC, only Procobol and now we´re migrating to
Postgresql and ODBC. The application logic doesn´t changed, but some applications have higher response times than the
Oracleversion. We worked on database tunning but even so, the response times are very different.
I turned on logging sql statemants in the server (log_duration) and discovered that the sum of all SQL duration times
givesonly 30% of the total response time felt at the client. This gives me a suspect that the bottleneck is outside the
server.
Am I in the right way?
How can I discover the SQL duration times at the client? Is there some tool I could use?
Thanks in advance!
Reimer
________________________________________
Yahoo! Messenger com voz: PROMOÇÃO VOCÊ PODE LEVAR UMA VIAGEM NA CONVERSA. Participe!
