On July 10, 2015 4:16:59 PM GMT+02:00, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
>> I think we should copy the SCHEMA option here and document that we
>use
>> the same schema. But it needs to be done in a way that doesn't error
>out
>> if the extension is not relocatable...
>
>Would that propagate down through multiple levels of CASCADE?
>(Although
>I'm not sure it would be sensible for a non-relocatable extension to
>depend on a relocatable one, so maybe the need doesn't arise in
>practice.)
I'd day so. I was thinking it'd adding a flag that allows to pass a schema to a non relocatable extension. That'd then
bepassed down. I agree that it's unlikely to be used often.
Andres
---
Please excuse brevity and formatting - I am writing this on my mobile phone.
