> 18 янв. 2022 г., в 03:54, Björn Harrtell <bjorn.harrtell@gmail.com> написал(а):
>
> There might be some deep reason in the architecture that I'm unaware of that could make it difficult to affect the
nodesize but regardless, I believe there could be a substantial win if node size could be controlled.
That's kind of orthogonal development path. Some years ago I had posted "GiST intrapage indexing" patch [0], that was
aimingto make a tree with fanout that is Sqrt(Items on page). But for now decreasing fillfactor == wasting a lot of
space,both in shared_buffers and on disk...
Thank you for raising this topic, I think I should rebase and refresh that patch too...
Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
[0] https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/7780A07B-4D04-41E2-B228-166B41D07EEE%40yandex-team.ru
