Saturday, February 09, 2013 6:56 AM Amit kapila wrote:
>Friday, February 08, 2013 11:06 PM Tom Lane wrote:
> >Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila(at)huawei(dot)com> writes:
>>> On Friday, February 08, 2013 12:00 AM Tom Lane wrote:
>>> As per my understanding, currently in code wherever Result node can be
>>> avoided,
>> Hm. Really there's a whole dance that typically goes on, which is like
>> if (!is_projection_capable_plan(result_plan))
>> ....
>> Perhaps we could encapsulate this whole sequence into a function called
>> say assign_targetlist_to_plan(), which would have the responsibility to
>> decide whether a Result node needs to be inserted.
> if (!is_projection_capable_plan(result_plan) && compare_tlist_exprs(sub_tlist, result_plan->targetlist) )
Sorry, the check I suggested in last mail should be as below:
if (!is_projection_capable_plan(result_plan) && !compare_tlist_exprs(sub_tlist, result_plan->targetlist) )
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
