Sorry for the self-reply...
On Oct 18, 2007, at 9:09 AM, Decibel! wrote:
> Is it intentional that dblink's unnamed connections don't get re-used?
From the dblink docs (both 8.1 and HEAD):
if only one argument is given, the connection is unnamed; only
one unnamed connection can exist at a time
So this sounds to me like a bug.
--
Decibel!, aka Jim C. Nasby, Database Architect decibel@decibel.org
Give your computer some brain candy! www.distributed.net Team #1828
