Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCEA0FC1F@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check  ("Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>)
Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > > 2.1 is the broken one.
> > >
> > > Exactly.  So we should reject it.
> >
> > We do. The code as-is *only* accepts 1.875. Thus it rejects 2.1.
>
> I think Tom's point is that we should reject only 2.1.  Isn't
> that the only version that fails?

Not entirely sure. I beleive there were older versions that don't work
as well... And you can't expect lots of older versions around - I'm sure
*at least* 99% of the ppl who are building withthis will download bison
specifically for this. And given that, they're going to get the latest
by default, or 1.875 if they read the (currently being written) README.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Magnus Hagander"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] MSVC build broken (again)
Next
From: "Zeugswetter Andreas DCP SD"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] vcbuild bison check