Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> Attached patch adds a version check for bison when running the
> > vc++
> > >>> build.
> > >>
> > >> Shouldn't it be looking for 2.1 as well?
> >
> > > 2.1 is the broken one.
> >
> > Exactly. So we should reject it.
>
> We do. The code as-is *only* accepts 1.875. Thus it rejects 2.1.
I think Tom's point is that we should reject only 2.1. Isn't that the
only version that fails?
--
Bruce Momjian bruce@momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
