Re: insert performance for win32 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: insert performance for win32
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE92E7EF@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to insert performance for win32  (Marc Cousin <mcousin@sigma.fr>)
Responses Re: insert performance for win32
List pgsql-performance
> > > Both win32 send/recv have pgwin32_poll_signals() in them.
> > > This is glorified WaitForSingleObjectEx on global
> > > pgwin32_signal_event.  This is probably part of the problem.
> > > Can we work some of the same magic you put into check interrupts
> > > macro?
> > >
> >
> > Uh, we already do that, don't we?
> >
> http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/port/win3
> > 2/
> > socket.c?rev=1.10
> > has:
> >
>
> Yeah, we did this. I am thinking of just use simple mechanism
> of the win32 sockets, which could not pick up signals, but I
> would like to see if there is any difference -- do you think
> there is any point to try this?

Sorry, I don't follow you here - what do you mean to do? Remove the
event completely so we can't wait on it?

//Magnus

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Sorted union
Next
From: Qingqing Zhou
Date:
Subject: Re: insert performance for win32