Re: win32 performance - fsync question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Magnus Hagander
Subject Re: win32 performance - fsync question
Date
Msg-id 6BCB9D8A16AC4241919521715F4D8BCE47690F@algol.sollentuna.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to win32 performance - fsync question  ("E.Rodichev" <er@sai.msu.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
>> Portability, or rather the complete lack of it.  Stuff that
>isn't in the
>> Single Unix Spec is a hard sell.
>
>O_DIRECT is reasonably common among modern Unixen (it is supported by
>Linux, FreeBSD, and probably a couple of the commercial variants like
>AIX or IRIX); it should also be reasonably easy to check for
>support at
>configure time. It's on my TODO list to take a gander at
>adding support
>for O_DIRECT for WAL, I just haven't gotten around to it yet.

Let me know when you do, and if you need some pointers on the win32
parts of it :-) I'll happily leave the main changes alone.

//Magnus


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: lsunley@mb.sympatico.ca
Date:
Subject: SMP buffer management test question
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: SMP buffer management test question