> >> >We've looked at it before. Apart from anything else I don't think
> >> >its license is compatible with PostgreSQL's.
> >>
> >> Well, people can still use it. We just can't distribute
> it... We can
> >> always link to it.
> >> But unless there is a GUI tool (actually, unless it shows up in the
> >> *default* GUI tool), expect there to be questions. An
> >
> > I assume we can just look at the source and write our own version
> > bypassing any license.
>
> I wouldn't be so sure about that. If this insane SCO crap has
> taught me anything, the PostgreSQL should have a defined and
> legally vetted process for duplicating functionality. ala'
> phoenix BIOS.
There is more than enough information om MSDN and other sites to make
this kind of tool without looking at the source. It's generic enough.
//Magnus
