Re: naming a primary key possible? - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Erik Jones
Subject Re: naming a primary key possible?
Date
Msg-id 6BA44F38-AD69-4E9F-B9AB-3461D522D04E@myemma.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to naming a primary key possible?  (Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com>)
Responses Re: naming a primary key possible?  (Ow Mun Heng <Ow.Mun.Heng@wdc.com>)
List pgsql-general
On Aug 27, 2007, at 8:50 PM, Ow Mun Heng wrote:

> Is it possible to name a primary key (composite) primary key rather
> than
> have pg default to table_name_pkey??
>
> I tried something like
>
> primary key pkey_table_short_form_name (a,b,c)
>
> but it didnt' work.
>

Give this a shot:

CONTRAINT pkey_table_short_form_name PRIMARY KEY (a,b,c)

That's not really clear from the top of the CREATE TABLE docs but
there's an example at the bottom that shows it.

Erik Jones

Software Developer | Emma®
erik@myemma.com
800.595.4401 or 615.292.5888
615.292.0777 (fax)

Emma helps organizations everywhere communicate & market in style.
Visit us online at http://www.myemma.com



pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Erik Jones
Date:
Subject: Re: Tables dissapearing
Next
From: Michael Glaesemann
Date:
Subject: Re: naming a primary key possible?