Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?) - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From robert engels
Subject Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)
Date
Msg-id 6A1ABD75-2DA6-4CD1-91FD-4EB39F66A566@ix.netcom.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)  (Andrew Perepelytsya <aperepel@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)  (Kris Jurka <jurka@ejurka.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
This seems like a very bad impl - at least for JDBC.

Why are the details of this access not hidden in the JDBC driver? The
column type is the only thing that a user should be concerned with.

Why would someone want to code proprietary Postgres code just to
access BLOBs?

The JDBC blob API is very good. Using either the BLOB/locator
interface or the getInputStream();

Oracle used to do a similar thing, and finally got with the program
and uses strict JDBC in their latest driver releases.


pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)
Next
From: Kris Jurka
Date:
Subject: Re: BLOB is read into memory instead of streaming (bug?)