Hello Tom,
On 31.03.2021 20:24, Tom Lane wrote:
> Based on nearby threads, it occurs to me to ask whether you have JIT
> enabled, and if so whether turning it off helps. There seems to be
> a known leak of the code fragments generated by that in some cases.
That's it!
I am quite surprised that a functionality, which is on by default does
generate such a massive leak and goes sort of undetected.
A single backend was leaking 250MB/hour, with my multiple connections it
was 2GB. But exactly that happened.
Doing a set jit=off immediately stopped the leak.
You mentioned that this seems to be known. Do you have pointers to the
relevant bug-tracker/thread? I would like to follow up on this.
I have not measured the impact of jit, but in theory it could bring
larger performance benefits. So having it enabled sounds like a good
idea, once it stops leaking.
I tried running Valgrind on postgres but I had not much success with it.
processes seemed to terminate quite frequently. My last use of Valgrind
is a while ago and my use-case back then was probably much simpler.
Is it known which queries are leading to a leak? I still have the
recording of mine, including explain. Would it help to narrow it further
down to single queries which leak? Or is the JIT re-creating optimized
code for each slightly modified one without freeing the old ones? So
re-running the same query would not leak?
https://downloads.osm-tools.org/postgresql-2021-04-03_183913.csv.gz
Stephan
