Re: SET autocommit begins transaction? - Mailing list pgsql-bugs

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Date
Msg-id 6972.1033265814@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-bugs
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Sean Chittenden wrote:
>> Was there any resolution to this or are SET's still starting a new
>> transaction?  I haven't seen any commits re: this, iirc.  -sc

> It is still an open item, but I think there was agreement that SET will
> not start a transaction, and we will document that.

There was?  I thought you were resisting it tooth and nail ;-)

If you're willing to accept this behavior, I shall make it happen.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-bugs by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: SET autocommit begins transaction?