Le 4 janvier 2019 13:16:48 GMT+01:00, Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> a écrit :
>On 19/11/2018 14:40, Tomas Vondra wrote:
>> On 11/19/18 2:57 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 12:18:33PM +0100, Dmitry Dolgov wrote:
>>>> Since it's hard to come up with a concise name that will mention
>sampling rate
>>>> in the context of min_duration_statement, I think it's fine to name
>this
>>>> configuration "log_sample_rate", as long as it's dependency from
>>>> log_min_duration_statements is clearly explained in the
>documentation.
>>>
>>> log_sample_rate looks fine to me as a name.
>>
>> That seems far too short to me - the name should indicate it applies
>to
>> statement logging. I'd say log_statement_sample_rate is better.
>
>It was committed with this name, but then one has to wonder why it
>doesn't also apply to log_statement.
>
>--
>Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
>PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
Yes, but maybe log_min_duration_statements_sample is too long?
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
