"Rocco Altier" <RoccoA@Routescape.com> writes:
> With the patch attached this time...
The proposed patch to Makefile.shlib makes me gag :-( ... lying to make
about what's the purpose of a rule is seldom a good idea. Please try
as attached instead. Also, I am *really* dubious about the change to
ecpg/test/Makefile.regress --- if that's necessary then this whole
exercise is wrong.
regards, tom lane
*** src/Makefile.shlib.orig Thu Apr 27 22:53:20 2006
--- src/Makefile.shlib Fri Sep 15 18:11:30 2006
***************
*** 96,103 ****
soname = lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION)
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), aix)
! shlib = lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX)
! # SHLIB_LINK += -lc
endif
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), darwin)
--- 96,103 ----
soname = lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION)
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), aix)
! shlib = lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION)
! haslibarule = yes
endif
ifeq ($(PORTNAME), darwin)
***************
*** 295,303 ****
else # PORTNAME == aix
# AIX case
! $(shlib): lib$(NAME).a
$(MKLDEXPORT) lib$(NAME).a > lib$(NAME)$(EXPSUFF)
! $(COMPILER) $(LDFLAGS_NO_L) $(LDFLAGS_SL) -o $@ $< -Wl,-bE:lib$(NAME)$(EXPSUFF) $(SHLIB_LINK)
endif # PORTNAME == aix
--- 295,307 ----
else # PORTNAME == aix
# AIX case
! $(shlib) lib$(NAME).a: $(OBJS)
! $(LINK.static) lib$(NAME).a $^
! $(RANLIB) lib$(NAME).a
$(MKLDEXPORT) lib$(NAME).a > lib$(NAME)$(EXPSUFF)
! $(COMPILER) $(LDFLAGS_NO_L) $(LDFLAGS_SL) -o $(shlib) lib$(NAME).a -Wl,-bE:lib$(NAME)$(EXPSUFF) $(SHLIB_LINK)
! rm -f lib$(NAME).a
! $(AR) $(AROPT) lib$(NAME).a $(shlib)
endif # PORTNAME == aix
***************
*** 350,355 ****
--- 354,360 ----
ifeq ($(enable_shared), yes)
install-lib-shared: $(shlib)
+ ifneq ($(PORTNAME), aix) # we don't install $(shlib) on AIX
$(INSTALL_SHLIB) $< '$(DESTDIR)$(libdir)/$(shlib)'
ifneq ($(PORTNAME), cygwin)
ifneq ($(PORTNAME), win32)
***************
*** 365,370 ****
--- 370,376 ----
endif
endif # not win32
endif # not cygwin
+ endif # not aix
endif # enable_shared
