On Jan 21, 2010, at 10:06 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, without a context that explains *why* you're doing that, it's hard
> to consider what a better solution would look like. Personally I
> usually prefer solutions involving WHERE oid = 'foo.bar'::regclass,
> because that scales easily to either providing or omitting the schema
> reference.
It never occurred to me. And does `oid = bar::regclass` return true if bar is in a schema not in the search path?
But yeah, I need to avoid errors, too.
> If you're trying to avoid throwing an error on bad schema name,
> a regschema type would not help you.
Good point.
Best,
David
