Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 9:59 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This patch seems unnecessary to me.
> Hmm. I see now that it's parallel, but I find it pretty confusing
> that building sepgsql without specifying --with-selinux results in a
> shared library that seems to compile OK but won't load.
Well, that's a fair point, but the same happens in contrib/xml2 (if you
have a setup that doesn't need a special -I switch, or you provide that
some other way), and nobody has ever complained about it.
> Why not just:
> SHLIB_LINK = -lselinux
I wouldn't have any particular objection to that (although I think it's
supposed to be += here). I don't see that any of the other changes
Kaigai proposed are helpful, though.
> Similarly, in the case of xml2 we have:
> SHLIB_LINK += $(filter -lxslt, $(LIBS)) $(filter -lxml2, $(LIBS))
> For xslt, it probably makes sense to filter it out if it wasn't found,
> because the code has ifdefs for USE_XSLT that do something sensible if
> the library is not there. But I fail to see what the point is of
> filtering out xml2, because surely we're doomed if that's not there...
> or am I confused?
Hmm. I think it's just that way to make the code look parallel for both
libraries. But I can see potential value in making -lxml2 unconditional
--- as you say, that would result in a link failure instead of a
silently broken library.
regards, tom lane
