On 19/02/17 12:03, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 2:01 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com <mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:50 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com <mailto:michael.paquier@gmail.com>> wrote:
> > I have been poking at it, and yeah... I missed the fact that
> > pg_subcription is not a view. I thought that check_conninfo was being
> > called in this context only..
>
> Still, storing plain passwords in system catalogs is a practice that
> should be discouraged as base backup data can go over a network as
> well... At least adding a note or a warning in the documentation would
> be nice about the fact that any kind of security-sensitive data should
> be avoided here.
>
>
> Isn't that moving the goalposts quite a bit? We already allow passwords
> in CREATE USER MAPPING without any warnings against it (in fact, we
> suggest that's what you should do), which is a similar situation. Same
> goes for dblink.
>
> If password auth is used, we have to store the password in plaintext
> equivalent somewhere. Meaning it's by definition going to be exposed to
> superusers and replication downstreams. Or are you suggesting a scheme
> whereby you have to enter all your subscription passwords in a prompt of
> some kind when starting the postmaster, to avoid it?
>
The subscriptions will happily use .pgpass for example so it's not like
users are forced to put password to catalog (well barring some DBaaS
solutions). But I guess it would not hurt to give extra notice in docs
about dangers of the various catalogs storing passwords.
-- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training &
Services
