Re: SQL-standard function body - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: SQL-standard function body
Date
Msg-id 684711.1593622224@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SQL-standard function body  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Is the SQL-standard function body verified as preventing function
> inlining?  That seems to be a major downside.

I see no reason why that would make any difference.  There might
be more code to be written than is in the patch, but in principle
inlining should not care whether the function is pre-parsed or not.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Mark Dilger
Date:
Subject: Re: Towards easier AMs: Cleaning up inappropriate use of name "relkind"
Next
From: Magnus Hagander
Date:
Subject: Re: Remove Deprecated Exclusive Backup Mode