Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> writes:
>> -> Index Scan Backward using merged_weight_date_idx on merged
>> (cost=0.00..31295593.98 rows=141839 width=229) (actual
>> time=3.888..10380.783 rows=500 loops=1)
> The mis-estimation of the result set of the index scan is clearly a
> problem -- have you run ANALYZE recently?
I'm not sure the above is a misestimation --- the actual rowcount is
going to be restricted by the LIMIT node (which I'm betting is actually
LIMIT 50 OFFSET 450, though that's strictly a guess from the rowcounts).
It would be useful to know how many rows match the query without any
LIMIT though.
> Otherwise, please provide the queries that trigger the problem and the
> relevant schema definitions.
Yes, giving people only the EXPLAIN output without the queries or table
definitions (in particular, the available indexes) is not a recipe for
getting quality advice.
regards, tom lane
