Re: Operator family docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Operator family docs
Date
Msg-id 6797.1168439314@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Operator family docs  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: Operator family docs  (Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
> states that
> "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."
> which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?

No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet.  I'm planning to do
just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles...
In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference
pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind).
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Change Windows rename and unlink substitutes so that they time
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit