Re: Operator family docs - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Dave Page
Subject Re: Operator family docs
Date
Msg-id 45A4F87A.8060609@postgresql.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Operator family docs  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Dave Page <dpage@postgresql.org> writes:
>> http://developer.postgresql.org/pgdocs/postgres/catalog-pg-opfamily.html
>> states that
>> "Operator families are described at length in Section 33.14."
>> which does not seem to be the case. Did it get missed in a commit?
> 
> No, I haven't got round to updating xindex.sgml yet.  I'm planning to do
> just one pass over it after all the opfamily and sorting dust settles...
> In the related commits so far, I've just been touching reference
> pages for the most part (catalogs.sgml is a reference page in my mind).

OK, thanks.

Regards, Dave.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-patches] [PATCHES] Last infomask bit
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Mark/Restore and avoiding RandomAccess sorts