Re: stress test for parallel workers - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: stress test for parallel workers
Date
Msg-id 6762.1563902927@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to stress test for parallel workers  (Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>)
Responses Re: stress test for parallel workers
List pgsql-hackers
Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com> writes:
> Does anyone have a stress test for parallel workers ?
> On a customer's new VM, I got this several times while (trying to) migrate their DB:

> < 2019-07-23 10:33:51.552 CDT postgres >FATAL:  postmaster exited during a parallel transaction

We've been seeing this irregularly in the buildfarm, too.  I've been
suspicious that it's from an OOM kill on the postmaster in the
buildfarm cases, but ...

> There's nothing in dmesg nor in postgres logs.

... you'd think an OOM kill would show up in the kernel log.
(Not necessarily in dmesg, though.  Did you try syslog?)

> Ideally a minimal test, since I'm apparently going to
> have to run under gdb to see how it's dying, or even what process is failing.

Like it told you, it's the postmaster that's going away.
That's Not Supposed To Happen, of course, but unfortunately Linux'
OOM kill heuristic preferentially targets the postmaster when
its children are consuming too many resources.

If that is the problem, there's some info on working around it at

https://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/kernel-resources.html#LINUX-MEMORY-OVERCOMMIT

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve performance of NOTIFY over many databases (issue blocking on AccessExclusiveLock on object 0 of class 1262 of database 0)
Next
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: [bug fix] Produce a crash dump before main() on Windows