Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> OK, how are we for bata packaging on Monday? I don't see how we can do
> that until we decide on how to handle unlogged materialized views.
In the interests of moving the discussion along, attached are draft
patches to show what I think we should do in 9.3. The first patch
disables the unlogged-matviews feature at the user level (and perhaps
could be reverted someday), while the second one moves
scannability-state storage into a pg_class column.
I had previously proposed that we keep scannability state in reloptions,
but that turns out not to be terribly easy because the relcache doesn't
store the reloptions part of the pg_class row; so this patch does it
with a new boolean column instead.
regards, tom lane
