On 2024-09-30 Mo 7:00 AM, Alexander Lakhin wrote:
> Hello Andrew and Thomas,
>
> 29.09.2024 18:47, Andrew Dunstan пишет:
>>
>> I'm inclined to think we might need to reverse the order of the last
>> two. TBH I don't really understand how this has worked up to now.
>>
>
> I've looked at the last successful run [1] and discovered that
> fe-secure-common.c didn't compile cleanly too:
> ccache gcc ...
> /home/pgrunner/bf/root/REL_15_STABLE/pgsql.build/../pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure-common.c
> C:/tools/nmsys64/home/pgrunner/bf/root/REL_15_STABLE/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure-common.c:
> In function 'pq_verify_peer_name_matches_certificate_ip':
> C:/tools/nmsys64/home/pgrunner/bf/root/REL_15_STABLE/pgsql/src/interfaces/libpq/fe-secure-common.c:219:21:
> warning: implicit declaration of function 'inet_pton'; did you mean
> 'inet_aton'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 219 | if (inet_pton(AF_INET6, host, &addr) == 1)
> | ^~~~~~~~~
> | inet_aton
>
> So it worked just because that missing declaration generated just a
> warning, not an error.
Ah, so this is because gcc 14.1.0 treats this as an error but gcc 12.2.0
treats it as a warning. Now it makes sense.
cheers
andrew
--
Andrew Dunstan
EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
