Re: v12 and pg_restore -f- - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-
Date
Msg-id 6692.1572879909@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: v12 and pg_restore -f-  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On 2019-Oct-17, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
>>> Tom, I take it your suggestion is to have '-f -' be accepted to mean
>>> 'goes to stdout' in all branches?

>> Yes.

> +1 for this, FWIW.  Let's get it done before next week minors.  Is
> anybody writing a patch?  If not, I can do it.

Please do.

>> No, I'm not proposing a full revert.  But there's certainly room to
>> consider reverting the part that says you *must* write "-f -" to get
>> output to stdout.

> I don't think this will buy us anything, if we get past branches updated
> promptly.

I'm okay with that approach.

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: alternative to PG_CATCH
Next
From: Tomas Vondra
Date:
Subject: Re: 64 bit transaction id