"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Fri, 2006-11-03 at 00:40 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Some experimentation shows that there is indeed an issue, eg this
>> function leaks about 16K per iteration in HEAD:
> So at 10,000 tpm that leaks a GB of RAM every 7 minutes.
Uh, no, because it's only an intra-function-call leak. My request
for testing the patch is still open though.
regards, tom lane