Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Palle Girgensohn
Subject Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with
Date
Msg-id 665403C5735AB956E9B4D706@palle.girgensohn.se
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with postgresql?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with  (Vsevolod Lobko <seva@sevasoft.kiev.ua>)
List pgsql-hackers
Does the same arguments apply for linking with libc_r (pthreads)?

It is needed by plpython, at least on FreeBSD 4.10 (probably all versions).

/Palle

--On onsdag, november 17, 2004 20.49.20 -0500 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> 
wrote:

> Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> writes:
>>> Is there a penalty in just leaving
>>> LDFLAGS+= -lstdc++
>>> in the postgresql port Makefile? Bad idea?
>
> Yup.  The portability hazards are considerable.  I'm a bit surprised the
> postgis guys seem to think it works.
>
>             regards, tom lane






pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: are there any cons to linking libstdc++ with postgresql?
Next
From: Neil Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: Tired of -Wold-style-definition already