Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j
Date
Msg-id 6620.1422547809@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:
> I propose to apply the attached to master and back-patch to 9.3, 
> and follow that with a patch (for master only) along the lines 
> suggested by Andres.  Since *that* change is more invasive and 
> changes existing behavior I will submit it to the open CF for 
> review.  Objections?

Only the nit-picky one that I quite dislike putting a comment block inside
an if-condition like that.  It's not really house style around here,
and in particular I suspect pgindent might not treat it nicely.
        regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Heikki Linnakangas
Date:
Subject: Memory leak in gingetbitmap
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Memory leak in gingetbitmap