Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j
Date
Msg-id 493940415.1823011.1422631180673.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> writes:

>> I propose to apply the attached to master and back-patch to 9.3

>> Objections?
>
> Only the nit-picky one that I quite dislike putting a comment 
> block inside an if-condition like that.

Comment moved above the if-condition, and pushed.

Thanks for the report, Alexander!

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andres Freund
Date:
Subject: Re: Overhauling our interrupt handling (was Escaping from blocked send() reprised.)
Next
From: David Fetter
Date:
Subject: Re: Proposal: knowing detail of config files via SQL