Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Kevin Grittner
Subject Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j
Date
Msg-id 947551413.1495534.1422547193881.JavaMail.yahoo@mail.yahoo.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j  (Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com>)
Responses Re: pg_dump with both --serializable-deferrable and -j
List pgsql-hackers
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn@ymail.com> wrote:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

>> A comment seems essential here, because as written anybody would
>> think the test for a snapshot is a bug.
>
> Good point.

I propose to apply the attached to master and back-patch to 9.3,
and follow that with a patch (for master only) along the lines
suggested by Andres.  Since *that* change is more invasive and
changes existing behavior I will submit it to the open CF for
review.  Objections?

--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

Attachment

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Noah Misch
Date:
Subject: Re: jsonb, unicode escapes and escaped backslashes
Next
From: Marco Nenciarini
Date:
Subject: pg_check_dir comments and implementation mismatch