Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Date
Msg-id 6603.1281541643@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Responses Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
List pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On ons, 2010-08-11 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> How about just this:
>>    port = 0xC000 | (DEF_PGPORT & 0x3FFF);

> The version number was put in there intentionally, for developers who
> work on multiple branches at once.  That's the whole reason this code
> exists.  Please don't remove it.

I work on multiple branches all day every day.  This wouldn't hinder
me in the slightest, because I use a different DEF_PGPORT for each
branch.  If you don't, it's hard to see how you manage to deal with
multiple branches on one machine ... do you not ever actually install
them?  Even if you don't, changing this would only mean that you
couldn't safely run "make check" concurrently in multiple branches.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: assertions and constraint triggers
Next
From: "Kevin Grittner"
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment