Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Date
Msg-id 1281550347.26522.13.camel@vanquo.pezone.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
On ons, 2010-08-11 at 11:47 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > On ons, 2010-08-11 at 10:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> How about just this:
> >>    port = 0xC000 | (DEF_PGPORT & 0x3FFF);
> 
> > The version number was put in there intentionally, for developers who
> > work on multiple branches at once.  That's the whole reason this code
> > exists.  Please don't remove it.
> 
> I work on multiple branches all day every day.  This wouldn't hinder
> me in the slightest, because I use a different DEF_PGPORT for each
> branch.  If you don't, it's hard to see how you manage to deal with
> multiple branches on one machine ... do you not ever actually install
> them?

No, not nearly as much as I run "make check".

> Even if you don't, changing this would only mean that you
> couldn't safely run "make check" concurrently in multiple branches.

That's exactly the point.  The original discussion is here:
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/491D9935.9010200@gmx.net




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Next
From: Daniel Oliveira
Date:
Subject: 16/32/48/64 bytes integers