Re: MERGE command for inheritance - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: MERGE command for inheritance
Date
Msg-id 1281549988-sup-763@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: MERGE command for inheritance  (Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Excerpts from Heikki Linnakangas's message of mié ago 11 10:52:24 -0400 2010:
> On 11/08/10 17:45, Simon Riggs wrote:

> > We've seen it time and time again
> > that big projects that aim to deliver towards end of a release cycle
> > interfere with dev of other projects and leave loose ends from
> > unforeseen interactions. There's no need for that.
> 
> I don't understand what you're saying, we're not in the end of a release 
> cycle.

This patch still needs a lot of work before it's anywhere close to
committable.  I agree with Simon that it is preferrable to clean it up
to make it committable *without* the burden of extra features.  If
Boxuan continues to add more features, it will be end-of-release before
it is possible to think about committing it.

It seems better to have merge-no-inheritance in 9.1 than nothing.  If we
can get the inheritance case working for 9.1, that's even better, but I
don't think it needs to be a hard requirement.

-- 
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment