Re: Reg: Size difference - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Adrian Klaver
Subject Re: Reg: Size difference
Date
Msg-id 65a64890-17b9-45ec-8ac4-afb61794806c@aklaver.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Reg: Size difference  (Vinay Oli <olivinay541@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Reg: Size difference
List pgsql-general
On 9/14/24 10:19, Vinay Oli wrote:
> Hi Team
> 
> I have been using PostgreSQL for the past 6 years. PostgreSQL has 
> significantly impacted my life, providing me with great opportunities 
> for knowledge and self-development.
> 
> I'm currently facing a strange issue with PostgreSQL 15.0. I have a 
> primary-standby setup that is in sync, with a replication slot in place. 
> There are 18 databases, and one of the databases on the primary side is 
> 104 GB, while the same database on the standby side is 216 GB. Both are 
> in sync with zero delay.

How are you measuring the size?

If you are measuring on the files system what is the size of the base/ 
and pg_wal/ sub-directories in the %PG_DATA directoty?

> 
> Could this be a bug? If so, has it been resolved in newer releases? If 
> it is not a bug, how can this issue be fixed? Is there a solution or any 
> supporting documentation available?
> 
> WAL and log files are being rotated properly. The issue is with a 
> database named services_mfs. On the primary cluster, the services_mfs 
> database is 104GB, but on the standby cluster, it is 216GB, even though 
> both cluster are in sync. The standby database is only used in case of a 
> crash, which is managed by a Patroni cluster with etcd.
> 
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vinay Kumar
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Adrian Klaver
adrian.klaver@aklaver.com




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: update faster way
Next
From: Laurenz Albe
Date:
Subject: Re: Reg: Size difference