Re: [PATCHES] A patch to pg_regress for Windows port - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Gurjeet Singh
Subject Re: [PATCHES] A patch to pg_regress for Windows port
Date
Msg-id 65937bea0701052048x2e862836p3b8fef4d2d28006a@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] A patch to pg_regress for Windows port  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] A patch to pg_regress for Windows port  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers


On 1/6/07, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
"Gurjeet Singh" <singh.gurjeet@gmail.com> writes:
> This patch removes double-quotes from around the listen_addresses=%s part; I
> couldn't find a way of doing that. But then, the questions is, can the %s
> (hostname) have spaces embedded in it?

Yes, because it can be more than one hostname.

But the code in postmaster.c expects the list to be comma separated.

        if (!SplitIdentifierString(rawstring, ',', &elemlist))
        {
            /* syntax error in list */
            ereport(FATAL,
                    (errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
                     errmsg("invalid list syntax for \"listen_addresses\"")));
        }

  Why do you want to
remove the quotes?
 
No, I didn't want to, but I was getting "FATAL:  the database system is starting up" in the log if I surrounded that var=val with double-quotes. Later I remedied that by attaching a -w option to the pg_ctl command.

 PS: there wasn't any patch attached,

but I doubt we'd have accepted it
anyway ...

Any particular reason?

A few minutes after the submission, after I read more code, I wouldn't have either! I noticed (and Magnus also pointed it out) that we use the returned PID to kill the postmaster if it doesn't respond. There's no easy way of doing that if we use pg_ctl to start the postmaster! Let's wait for Magnus' patch to make pg_regress independent of MinGW.

Best regards,

--
gurjeet[.singh]@EnterpriseDB.com
singh.gurjeet@{ gmail | hotmail | yahoo }.com

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: ideas for auto-processing patches
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] A patch to pg_regress for Windows port