Re: Alternative cluster location - Mailing list pgsql-general

From
Subject Re: Alternative cluster location
Date
Msg-id 65093.216.238.112.88.1069084085.squirrel@$HOSTNAME
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Alternative cluster location  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-general
> btober@seaworthysys.com writes:
>
>> So I've been thinking that the /var/lib/pgsql/data default cluster
>> data directory was an odd choice, since a database, which while
>> definitely subject to lots of change (which favors /var...), is
>> likely neither temporary nor small (which argues for somewhere else,
>> I think).
>
> The /var directory is for variable data files.  Nothing says anything
> about temporary or small.

Agreed that nothing says the files are necessarily small, but the
"advice" regarding disk partitioning I read implied small by saying that
the hard drive partition created with the intention of mounting as /var
*usually* does not need to be large. O.k., the writer probably was not
thinking of RDBMS.

>
>> probably did so with good reason, I'm compelled to ask what do some
>> of you think about the idea of creating a "home" directory for
>> postgres on the partition mounted at /home, and using, say,
>> /home/postgres/pgsql/data as the cluster data directory
>
> Sure you can do that, but it doesn't seem particularly cleaner to me.

Only as an anthropomorphism: Since even though no such actual person
exists, all the database files are "owned" by the "user" postgres, which
is what leads me to think of this approach.

> You might argue that "home" is for personal files, so you would be at
> the wrong place again.
> In the end, it's purely a matter of personal (or organizational) taste,
> not a technical tradeoff.

Thank you.

~Berend Tober




pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: kdebisschop@alert.infoplease.com
Date:
Subject: Re: Alternative cluster location
Next
From: "Marc G. Fournier"
Date:
Subject: Take a minute to make yourself heard ... (PostgreSQL vs ...)