I can't quite understand the problem. There are minor differences
between insert triggers and update triggers in postgresql...
AFAIK the values OLD and NEW are related to the data being
inserted/updated/modified right now and can't imagine why someone
would use 'old' in a simple insert statement, but here goes my
humble opinions:
1 - make two triggers. One for insertin and another for updating
2 - short-circuit OR can be "simulated" using if-then-else clauses:
if new.expires is null then
new.expires = //whatever//
else
if new.expires = old.expires then
new.expires = //whatever//
end if;
end if;
If you want to be sure that a column is being modified, write a
update trigger.
Hope this helps a bit.
> I have a trigger that sets an expires column to
> last_access+expiry::interval if expires IS NULL or if the expires value
> isn't being set or changed.
>
> IF NEW.expires IS NULL OR NEW.expires = OLD.expires THEN
> NEW.expires = NEW.last_access+NEW.expiry:interval;
> END IF;
>
> The problem here is OLD doesn't exist on the first INSERT which throws
> an error. It seems PL/pgSQL doesn't have C's short-circuit booleans.
>
> a) Is there a way around this?
> b) is there a 'right' way to determine if a column is being changed?
>
> Paul (total PL/pgSQL newbie)
>
> --
> Paul Makepeace ................................
> http://paulm.com/ecademy
>
> "If I had new shoes, then he wouldn't sing Halleighluha."
> -- http://paulm.com/toys/surrealism/
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
