Postgres Pro
Downloads
Home   >   mailing lists

Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tomas Vondra
Subject Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal)
Date
Msg-id 64b2d53c-7c58-f052-32f1-38ce6e1cd0a5@2ndquadrant.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables(wal_level=minimal)  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: heap_sync seems rather oblivious to partitioned tables (wal_level=minimal)  (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tree view 
On 11/17/18 4:53 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Here are versions for branches 10 and 11.  The main change is that the
> COPY test didn't have the partitioned table, because it was recently
> introduced (0d5f05cde011) so I backpatched that part also.  It's a bit
> useless, but I'd rather backpatch the same thing rather than have
> different lines there ...
> 

The patch seems fine to me.

It's a bit unfortunate that we simply disable the optimization on 
partitioned tables instead of fixing it somehow, but I guess it's better 
than nothing and no one has a very good idea how to make it work.

regards

-- 
Tomas Vondra                  http://www.2ndQuadrant.com
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Amit Kapila
Date:
Subject: Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Next
From: Daniel Westermann
Date:
Subject: Re: zheap: a new storage format for PostgreSQL