Hi,
> Have you verified if tihs affects _MSC_VER < 1400? Suddently that
> branch would care about HAVE_CRTDEFS_H, and I'm not sure if that's
> something we need to worry about.
I have no MSVC. In that sense it is not verified in fact, and I hope
those who knows well would kindly comment on it.
However, it appears that pg_config.h is not created through
configure, but just copied from pg_config.h.win32 in those
compilers and thus HAVE_CRTDEFS_H will not be defined.
So, I think this code fragment will not be enabled in
_MSC_VER < 1400
In addition, the code fragment should have no harm as far as they
have crtdefs.h.
(Again, this is I think it should, and not tested with real tools.)
On 2011/12/03, at 23:20, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 09:24, NISHIYAMA Tomoaki
> <tomoakin@staff.kanazawa-u.ac.jp> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> A new patch:
>> check for the presence of crtdefs.h in configure
>>
>> -#if _MSC_VER >= 1400 || defined(WIN64)
>> +#if _MSC_VER >= 1400 || HAVE_CRTDEFS_H
>> #define errcode __msvc_errcode
>> #include <crtdefs.h>
>> #undef errcode
>
> Have you verified if tihs affects _MSC_VER < 1400? Suddently that
> branch would care about HAVE_CRTDEFS_H, and I'm not sure if that's
> something we need to worry about.
>
> --
> Magnus Hagander
> Me: http://www.hagander.net/
> Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>
