Re: Question on Opteron performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Christopher Petrilli
Subject Re: Question on Opteron performance
Date
Msg-id 6439E458-72DA-11D8-8B07-003065E15634@amber.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Question on Opteron performance  ("Steve Wolfe" <nw@codon.com>)
Responses Re: Question on Opteron performance
List pgsql-general
On Mar 10, 2004, at 3:14 PM, Steve Wolfe wrote:

>    Before I shell out the $15k on the 4-way Opteron, I'm going to spend
> some long, hard time looking for ways to make the system more
> efficient.
> However, after all that's already been done, I'm not optimistic that
> it's
> going to preclude needing the new server.  I'm just surprised that
> nobody
> seems to have used PostgreSQL on a quad-Opteron before!

Well, I haven't had a chance to run PostgreSQL on a quad-Opteron box,
but in discussing this with someone building a cluster out of them,
their experience is that they are seeing better performance out of a
quad-Opteron than a 3Ghz Xeon box (quad as well), which they believe
reflects superior memory architecture.  So, if someone has run on a
quad-Xeon of similar "specs", then I would imagine you should see
similar, if not better, numbers.

Chris
--
| Christopher Petrilli
| petrilli (at) amber.org


pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Randall Skelton
Date:
Subject: Re: returning row numbers in select
Next
From: Josué Maldonado
Date:
Subject: Organize tables in schemas